![]() ![]() So am left scratching head here and again. Nothing seems amiss and appears to be working normally. By higher tty's am now assuming you mean higher than the one this logs in on = tty1 and nopers am not seeing the same behavior CwF. Am at a loss, everything worked as expected, user was logged out normally. Of course had to dork, so put the nf file as it is in the OP and rebooted, nothing unusual, logged my user onto tty4, ran startx to start X, browsed around the web for awhile, killed X with "openbox -exit" took me to the expected command prompt, logged my user out with "exit", switched back to ongoing session on tty1 and back again to check. ![]() Would pursue that and bug him in a PM or summin, if it's really important to you. In which case you'd have to start a help thread on it, would really need to provide folks MUCH more info in it and honestly wouldn't bother as I'd bet ca$h you aren't going to get any better direction on this in a dedicated thread about it than Head_on already pointed out. You switch to one of those, same thing happens, nope. If you think your issue is related to what's in this tute an obvious 1st step is doing that type of thing. again only a thought but switch methods for doing this to what Head_on posted, it's changing two files and a reboot and/or try a display manager too. PS, definitely wurve Firefox, Debian's the universal OS and FF has got to be the universal web-browser, am sure there are a gazillion things about FF I don't know, gotta wurve a browser that everytime you use the thing you can find something new and interesting. LMFrigAO, been using FF since there's been a FF and never heard of this, Caret browsing ? Wth ? #Multiseat x session startx movie#Alright, movie time.įunny some weird thing I just found in FF, it's called Caret browsing, you press F7 to turn it off/on and it looks like it's some kind of keyboard mouse, says puts movable cursor in webpgs and allows someone to select text with the keyboard. Only way to really know would be hands on and take much time for something that sounds like it's not all that big a deal or real problem for you anyway. I really like systemd personally anyway.ĭid I ever mention I tend to wayyyyy overthink chit ? Just too many things which could be, might be, blahblahblah. Such as when a user wants to logout of one of them. For some more groundless (and probably incorrrect) speculation maybe even a systemd bug, what version is involved here ? The thing is apparently now responsible for setting up VT's to a great extent, thus should play a keyrole in tearing them down too. Only getting the feeling it has nothing to do with autologin/startx without a display manager, more that the issue lay somewhere else, something to do with configuration or the way things are setup. Really what he posted seems more proper and clean anyway. Would be curious, if it's easily possible for you to employ Head_on's method, the approach he posted for this and see if it acts the same way. No way I'd even try to replicate the kind of setup you describe, it sounds involved setting such a configuration up. Am mentally worn out right now so going to fallback to watching a movie. It's gnu/Linux when isn't there many ways to do just about anything and everything ? Other than all this babbling/droning I don't have much of value to offer about the issue. Am about 110% certain there's MANY ways to address it, make things work smoothly, outside of the one Head_on was nice enough to provide already. Nothing at all wrong with that either and it sounds interesting + cool. Running apps or whatever else in a bunch of the tty's. I thought you were doing something like that, some of your nix-wizardry. At this point I still really don't understand what's even going on here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |